For generations, human examiners have been trusted as the gold standard of assessment. Yet mounting evidence shows that traditional marking is far from objective, consistent or fair. As education systems, professional bodies and employers place increasing weight on assessment outcomes, the limitations of human marking are becoming impossible to ignore.
In an era defined by data, transparency and accountability, digital assessment is no longer simply an efficiency upgrade. It is a necessary evolution to ensure fairness, reliability and trust in assessment.
The Hidden Problem with Human Marking
Human marking is influenced by a wide range of unconscious factors that introduce variability into results. Even with detailed mark schemes, moderation processes and examiner training, studies consistently show that two experienced markers can award different grades to the same script.
In practice, inconsistency in marking can arise in many ways. Accuracy naturally declines during long marking sessions as fatigue sets in. Subconscious judgements can be influenced by factors such as handwriting, language style or a marker’s perception of a candidate’s ability. Over time, even experienced examiners can gradually shift their interpretation of standards as they work through large volumes of scripts. A particularly strong or weak answer can affect how the next script is judged, and tight marking deadlines can increase the likelihood of mistakes under pressure.
A candidate’s grade can depend as much on who marks their work as on the quality of the work itself. For high-stakes exams, professional certification and recruitment assessments, this level of uncertainty is increasingly unacceptable.
Why Consistency Matters More Than Ever
Consistency in marking has never mattered more. Assessment results shape life chances, determining access to education, employment, professional status and career progression. When marking is inconsistent, it undermines fairness, leaving candidates open to unequal treatment depending on who marks their work or where it is marked. It weakens trust, making it harder for learners, parents and employers to have confidence in results. It calls into question the validity of outcomes if grades reflect examiner variability rather than true ability, and it creates challenges for awarding bodies that must be able to justify and defend their decisions.
Digital Assessment: A New Standard for Reliability
Digital assessment transforms how we design, deliver and evaluate tests. When implemented well, it dramatically improves consistency while opening the door to more authentic, scalable and data-rich assessment models.
Key advantages include:
Addressing the Myths About Digital Marking
There is still resistance to implementing digital assessment, particularly in high stakes assessment, even though countries including Canada, Finland and New Zealand are embracing the benefits of digital assessment.
The widespread implementation of AI means that digital assessment can be used in a wide range of scenarios to evaluate structure, coherence, logic, accuracy and relevance with human experts remaining central to governance and quality assurance.
The result is not less rigour, but more.
A Fairer, More Trusted Future for Assessment
Digital assessment is not about removing people from the process. It is about removing avoidable inconsistency, bias and error. By combining technology with expert human oversight, assessment providers can deliver systems that are more reliable, more scalable, more transparent and fairer.
At a time when trust in qualifications and credentials is under intense scrutiny, modernising assessment is no longer optional. It is essential.
Patrick Coates, CEO of the e-Assessment Association says, “By combining the best of human insight with the power of digital technology, we can create a system that is not only more efficient and scalable, but also more authentic, inclusive and reflective of the real world our learners are heading into. Our annual e-Assessment Conference takes place in June in London, with 3 days of expert speakers, case studies and the top industry suppliers available to share their expertise. For anyone who has doubts about the potential of digital assessment, I urge them to come along.”
About the e-Assessment Association
As the global community for digital assessment, the e-Assessment Association continues to bring together exam boards, regulators, technology providers, educators and employers to share best practice, research and innovation.
Through collaboration, evidence and thought leadership, the eAA is helping shape a future where assessment is more accurate, inclusive and trusted for learners, institutions and employers worldwide.
Individuals can join the eAA for free. Find out more here.
Find out more about the 2026 International e-Assessment Conference here.
Further reading on Human Marking Inconsistency
Join the global community advancing e-assessment through innovation, research, and collaboration.
Keep informed
This site uses cookies to monitor site performance and provide a mode responsive and personalised experience. You must agree to our use of certain cookies. For more information on how we use and manage cookies, please read our Privacy Policy.